<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Seraph Retirement Planner Blog</title>
    <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://hailcat.app/blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description>Retirement questions run through a Monte Carlo engine. Worked examples with real projected outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 21:14:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>How higher interest rates affect annuity pricing</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/how-higher-rates-affect-annuity-pricing.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/how-higher-rates-affect-annuity-pricing.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Corporate bond yields rose about one percentage point over the past year. We price the effect on annuity income at every age from 60 to 80, and work through who partial annuitization suits and who it does not.</description>
      <category>Interest Rates</category>
      <category>Lifetime Income</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spending guardrails in retirement planning and how they help</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/what-spending-guardrails-cost.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/what-spending-guardrails-cost.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>We model dynamic spending guardrails on one retiree&#x27;s plan at eleven cut allowances, from 0 to 50 percent of her budget: the success rate climbs from 68 to 84 percent and levels off, while the average lifetime spending cut grows to $124,000.</description>
      <category>Dynamic Spending</category>
      <category>Strategy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the 4 percent rule safe? We graded it twenty times.</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/is-the-4-percent-rule-safe.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/is-the-4-percent-rule-safe.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Bengen now says 4.7 percent, Morningstar says 3.9. We took the classic 4 percent rule and graded it for three retirees at 50, 65, and 75: twenty runs of 2,000 simulated lifetimes, at withdrawal rates from 3 to 6 percent and starting ages from 50 to 75.</description>
      <category>Rules Of Thumb</category>
      <category>Withdrawal Rates</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Social Security runs short in 2032. What does a 22 percent cut do to your plan?</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/what-a-22-percent-social-security-cut-does-to-your-plan.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/what-a-22-percent-social-security-cut-does-to-your-plan.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The 2026 Trustees Report puts the retirement fund&#x27;s depletion in late 2032, with 78 percent of benefits payable after. We ran the cut through 2,000 simulated lifetimes at claim ages 62, 67, and 70. It flips the claiming decision.</description>
      <category>Current Events</category>
      <category>Social Security</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is AI going to do to my retirement?</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/what-is-ai-going-to-do-to-my-retirement-plans.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/what-is-ai-going-to-do-to-my-retirement-plans.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The research says AI is ending some careers early. We ran the household math: 5,000 simulated lifetimes for a 57-year-old who just lost the job, every repair from spending cuts to Social Security timing, plus a full AI-economy scenario.</description>
      <category>Current Events</category>
      <category>Career Risk</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How do you port a financial model and know you didn&#x27;t break it?</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/porting-a-financial-model.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/porting-a-financial-model.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Porting a Python retirement Monte Carlo engine to Swift, and the three pieces of correctness infrastructure that kept it faithful: an exact-match oracle, a decoupling discipline, and a frozen seed schedule.</description>
      <category>Under The Hood</category>
      <category>Engineering</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Retiring at 55 with $1.2 million? Watch the tightrope at $62,600.</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/retiring-at-55-the-62600-tightrope.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/retiring-at-55-the-62600-tightrope.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Early retirement math obsesses over withdrawal rates. The decade that actually decides the plan is health insurance from 55 to 65. We built the household and ran 5,000 lifetimes.</description>
      <category>Early Retirement</category>
      <category>Health Insurance</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Taking Social Security at 62 or 70? Let&#x27;s actually run it.</title>
      <link>https://hailcat.app/blog/taking-social-security-at-62-or-70.html</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://hailcat.app/blog/taking-social-security-at-62-or-70.html</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Our first post. Why we built a retirement planner, and what its Monte Carlo engine actually says about claiming Social Security at 62 versus waiting until 70.</description>
      <category>First Post</category>
      <category>Social Security</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
